![]() ![]() The Asus ProArt PA348CGV is an exception to this rule. Most professional monitors are not good for gaming, as they lack both the pixel response times and refresh rates gamers demand. That’s enough to place the PA348CV ahead of similarly priced competitors. However, HDR performance is passable for general use, providing some increase in brilliance and a bit more detail in bright portions of a scene. It lacks the brightness and contrast required to make HDR content truly stand out. There are still serious limitations to the PA348CV’s HDR performance. For example, maximizing HDR brightness didn’t cause the cells of an Excel spreadsheet to disappear, a problem visible on many entry-level HDR monitors. It also caused blotchy variations in brightness when viewing dark scenes. While it didn’t ruin image quality, local dimming also failed to increase the measured contrast ratio. Switching between scenes doesn’t normally cause a dramatic and distracting variance in brightness.īut don’t get too excited. I was shocked to find it performs okay despite the monitor’s basic backlight system. The exception to this is the monitor’s local dimming mode, which is on by default. In short, the display appears uniformly bright when showing a variety of bright content. Maximum HDR brightness is good at 515 nits, and the monitor sustains this brightness well without fluctuation between full-screen and 10 percent windows. That left me with low expectations, and the monitor easily cleared them. The Asus ProArt PA348CGV supports HDR10 but isn’t VESA DisplayHDR certified. This monitor is an excellent choice for a home office, as it’s well suited to both professional applications and PC games. It does a wonderful job of blending the precision content creators demand with the brilliance and punchy color owners will want for casual use. I came away impressed by the Asus ProArt PA348CGV’s SDR performance. Serious photographers may also need more pixels to handle high-resolution DSLR photos. However, there’s not enough resolution here for 4K video editing. Fine fonts are detailed, photos look sharp, and games seem crisp. This is similar to a 27-inch 1440p monitor. The monitor’s resolution of 3440×1440, spread across the 34 inches of ultrawide screen, provides a pixel density of 109 pixels per inch. These settings also were accurate to their stated targets, which makes calibrating the monitor to your specific needs easy. ![]() And, as mentioned, the monitor has multiple gamma color temperature settings. It hit a gamma curve of 2.2, which means content looks about as bright as expected, and an ideal color temperature of 6500K. The monitor also did well in gamma and color temperature. None of these monitors, aside from the BenQ EX3415R, are especially inaccurate, but it’s always great to see precision in a monitor built for content creation. Color accuracy comes in strong, defeating all other monitors in this competitive set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |